The artist uses the term "Object" to describe something that, in his view, cannot conceptually belong to the realm of art.
The artist uses the term "Object" to describe something that, in his view, cannot conceptually belong to the realm of art.
However, this ironic stance begins to collapse when we take a closer look at the presented works. Beneath the surface play with elements of popular culture lies a clear social message — and it is precisely this that justifies the artist’s position.
In his belief, true art looks toward the future and does not dwell on the transient. Yet it is impossible to move forward without a profound rethinking of the past.
"Blanket" 2018
This work draws on the idiom “pulling the blanket over oneself,” a metaphor for social conflict in which different parties compete for power, privilege, or control. What begins as a seemingly minor rivalry can become the seed of a much greater tragedy.
Here, the metaphor is made literal — the sculpted blanket is tightly bound with rope, resembling a bundle or sheaf, giving form to the expression. The squares on the surface evoke land, referencing ancient Slavic symbolism, where earth held sacred meaning. Tragically, the struggle for land remains a source of violence to this day, soaking the soil with blood time and again.
"Cancellation of censorship" 2023
This is already the third variation of the object, but in fact, it represents the second part of the triptych “The History of Art.”
The entire cycle is built around the image of barrier tapes. In the first piece, tapes marked with “CENSORED” wrap around the invisible shape of a vase, creating in space the illusion of a familiar silhouette. This gesture alludes to the idea that the vase, as an artistic object, has lost its significance — it exists, but only within the context of taboo.
In the "Cancellation of censorship" the restrictions have been cast off. We see the tapes that once constrained the form now lying discarded in a trash bin — a symbol of an abandoned canon that has finally been broken free from. The very act of rejecting former boundaries was, at one time, what defined art.
The triptych concludes with a third piece: barrier posts, like those seen in museums or airports, form a one-by-one meter square. Ceramic tapes stretched between them read “PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH THE ARTWORK.” The square encloses emptiness, revealing the true content of contemporary art.
"Monarch" 2018
This object continues the series in which the blanket is seen as a coveted symbol of power and dominance. Here, the blanket takes the form of a royal mantle, while the pillow appears as a crown. One might imagine a monarch or a high-ranking clergyman — but the king is, in fact, “naked.” In other words, it is the entourage that makes the king. And when the entourage is gone, only the garments remain. The absence of the figure emphasizes how authority is often a matter of perception.
The piece also alludes to a child imagining themselves as someone important, testing the boundaries of their control. And this seemingly harmless trait can, over time, grow into a dictator.
Several other objects from the series